NonProfit Management Solutions, Inc.
   


Terrie Temkin, Ph.D.


Video Clip


Press Room


Links


   

 
Nonprofit Boards and Governance Review

Adjusting Your Bylaws to Promote a Strategic Thinking Board
(Part 2 of a 5 part series)

This article appeared in CharityChannel on Sep 25, 2003.


Nonprofit Boards and Governance Review
Adjusting Your Bylaws to Promote a Strategic Thinking Board
(Part 2 of a 5 part series)

By Terrie Temkin, Ph.D.
NonProfit Management Solutions, Inc.


How To Build A Strategic Thinking Board, Part 2 of 5

Building a strategic thinking board is not difficult. Those familiar with best practices in the areas of board development and governance will recognize most of the steps. The key is putting them all together and making them an integral part of your organization's culture.

The steps can be classified in four basic areas: adjusting your bylaws to promote strategic thinking; recruiting strategic thinkers; orienting board members to the organization and their responsibility for strategic thinking; and, structuring meetings to maximize strategic input. In this article I will deal with the bylaws.

Adjusting Your Bylaws

All too often, organizations inhibit strategic thinking without realizing it because they operate under bylaws that stipulate practices that are counter-productive to the thoughtful exchange of information, ideas and intuition -- cornerstones of the strategic thinking process. While I am a strong believer that there is no one way to run an effective board, there are four factors typically spelled out in bylaws that can have a dramatic impact on a board's ability to think strategically. These are the size of the board, the use of executive committees, the frequency of board meetings and the medium through which board members can participate.

Size of Board

Many boards are large by design. The reasoning is that each additional board member extends the reach of the organization into new spheres of influence and affluence. However, if a board is to think strategically, every board member must participate, offering his or her unique perspective on issues. Large boards prohibit this. It is too easy for someone to sit back and abdicate any sense of responsibility.

So what is too large? A board is too large if the members cannot sit around a table and easily eyeball one another. Generally speaking, this means limiting board membership to under 20, with 7-15 being more conducive to substantive interactions. If you are concerned about losing your reach, use committees made up of people who do not sit on the board. Remember, the goal here is to use the board to provide strategic direction, not be all things to all people -- or, in this case, be all things to the organization.

Executive Committees

Few constructs do more to limit strategic thinking than executive committees. Having a small group make decisions behind closed doors does little to encourage committed thoughtful participation by the larger group. Whether the executive committee presents its decisions as fait accomplis or thinly-disguises them as recommendations, the rest of the board understands that its role is to rubberstamp those decisions. And, if that is the case, no one is going to waste time or effort in thinking through ramifications or other options. The usual justification for executive committees -- to make quick decisions in times of crisis -- is moot if your board is small enough.

Frequency of Board Meetings

The trend over the last several years has been to reduce the number of meetings board members are expected to attend -- in some cases, to as few as one or two a year. Board members have a legal duty -- the Duty of Care -- to make informed decisions. One can hardly be expected to make informed, strategic decisions if meeting only one, two, or even five or six times a year. Needed knowledge about the organization is just not going to be there.

I am not suggesting that boards need to meet once a month. An organization could choose to meet on an evenly-spaced schedule like every four to seven weeks, but it could also decide to meet more frequently during the organization's busy seasons and less frequently at other times. If you want strategic thinking, be strategic about your meetings. What I would not suggest is to eliminate all summer meetings. The work of the organization does not stop just because it is vacation time for the majority of people.

Means of Participation

Board members are busy. They travel, life interrupts. However, you need most of your board members at each meeting if you are to get the best strategic thinking. Consider using today's technology to increase participation.

Each state has different laws regulating the use of technology as a means for conducting board business. Clearly, your bylaws must be in compliance. However, many states merely require that people be able to participate simultaneously. This would allow the use of conference calls, chat rooms or online conferencing. The latter, among other things, allows everyone to see the same visuals, annotate those visuals, hear each other talk, and take votes. You could even put up everyone's pictures so that people can put faces to names and ideas.

The use of this technology has the additional benefit of allowing you to broaden your search area when seeking the best strategic thinkers in your mission area. You are no longer limited by where people reside or by concerns that they may not be sufficiently able-bodied to physically attend meetings.

If you are concerned that your organization will lose too much by meeting via technology consider placing limits on such participation. For instance, you might require that everyone attend a minimum number of meetings in person before "attending" a board meeting via conference call. Or, you might limit the number of times within a given year someone can participate using one of these alternative mediums.

The key to all of this is to consider the changes your organization needs to make in how it functions in order to facilitate more strategic thinking. Once you've identified those changes, you must change your bylaws to provide the necessary authorization to operate in the desired fashion.

In Part three of this series I will cover recruiting strategic thinkers.


Editor's Note: Our thanks to Terrie Temkin her contribution to Nonprofit Boards & Governance Review. More information about Terrie can be found at: http://charitychannel.com/resources/Detailed/600.html




Go to Top of Page

 

 

 

   
NonProfit Management Solutions, Inc.
P.O. Box 7536, Hollywood, FL 33081
Toll Free: (866) 985-9489
Local: (954) 985-9489
Fax: (954) 989-3442
E-mail: terriet@nonprofitmanagementsolutions.com

   

     
www.nonprofitmanagementsolutions.com

   
© 2000 NonProfit Management Solutions, Inc. All rights reserved.
Permission to link to this website is not required, but notification is appreciated.